4.7 Article

Reactive oxygen species are involved in FasL-induced caspase-independent cell death and inflammatory responses

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 643-655

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.11.022

关键词

Fas; RIP1; ROS; Caspase; JNK; MEF; Inflammation; Free radicals

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC96-2752-B-002-006-PAE, NSC95-2314-B-341-005-MY2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fas-mediated caspase-dependent cell apoptosis has been well investigated. However, recent studies have shown that Fas can induce nonapoptotic caspase-independent cell death (CICD) when caspase activity is inhibited. Currently, the molecular mechanism of this alternative cell death mediated by Fas remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the signaling pathway of Fas-induced CICD in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) whose caspase function was disrupted by the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK and its coupling to inflammatory responses. Our results revealed that receptor-interacting protein 1 and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2 play important roles in FasL-induced CICD. This death is associated with intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production from mitochondria, as a ROS scavenger (BHA), antioxidants (trolox, NAC), and a mitochondrial respiratory chain uncoupler (rotenone) could prevent this event. Furthermore, delayed and sustained JNK activation, mitochondrial membrane potential breakdown, and loss of intracellular GSH were observed. In addition to CICD, FasL also induces cyclooxygenase-2 and MIP-2 gene upregulation, and both responses are attributed to ROS-dependent JNK activation. Taken together, these results demonstrate alternative signaling pathways of Fas upon caspase inhibition in MEFs that are unrelated to the classical apoptotic pathway, but steer cells toward necrosis and an inflammatory response through ROS production. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据