4.7 Article

Detection of mitochondrial dysfunction by EPR technique in mouse model of dilated cardiomyopathy

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 321-328

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.04.016

关键词

heart failure; mitochondria; EPR; semiquinones; iron

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tg alpha q*44 mice with targeted overexpression of activated G alpha q protein in cardiomyocytes mimic many of the phenotypic characteristics of dilated cardiomyopathy in humans. However, it is not known whether the phenotype of Tg alpha q*44 mice would also involve dysfunction of cardiac mitochondria. The aim of the present work was to examine changes in EPR signals of semiquinones and iron in Fe-S clusters, as compared to classical biochemical indices of mitochondrial function in hearts from Tg alpha q*44 mice in relation to the progression of heart failure. Tg alpha q*44 mice at the age of 14 months displayed pulmonary congestion, increased heart/body ratio and impairment of cardiac function as measured in vivo by MRI. However, in hearts from Tg alpha q*44 mice already at the age of 10 months EPR signals of semiquinones, as well as cyt c oxidase activity were decreased, suggesting alterations in mitochondrial electron flow. Furthermore, in 14-months old Tg alpha q*44 mice loss of iron in Fe-S clusters, impaired citrate synthase activity, and altered mitochondrial ultrastructure were observed, supporting mitochondrial dysfunction in Tg alpha q*44 mice. In conclusion, the assessment of semiquinones content and Fe(III) analysis by EPR represents a rational approach to detect dysfunction of cardiac mitochondria. Decreased contents of semiquinones detected by EPR and a parallel decrease in cyt c oxidase activity occurs before hemodynamic decompensation of heart failure in Tg alpha q*44 mice suggesting that alterations in function of cardiac mitochondria contribute to the development of the overt heart failure in this model. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据