4.7 Article

Protective effect of new S-acylglutathione derivatives against amyloid-induced oxidative stress

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 44, 期 8, 页码 1624-1636

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.01.025

关键词

Alzheimer disease; A beta 42; antioxidants; S-acylglutathione derivatives; oxidative stress; amyloid toxicity; free radicals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent data support the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD). In particular, glutathione (GSH) metabolism is altered and its levels are decreased in affected brain regions and peripheral cells from AD patients and in experimental models of AD. In the past decade, interest in the protective effects of various antioxidants aimed at increasing intracellular GSH content has been growing. Because much experimental evidence suggests a possible protective role of unsaturated fatty acids in age-related diseases, we designed the synthesis of new S-acylglutathione (acyl-SG) thioesters. S-Lauroylglutathione (lauroyl-SG) and S-palmitoleoylglutathione (palmitoleoyl-SG) were easily internalized into the cells and they significantly reduced A beta 42-induced oxidative stress in human neurotypic SH-SY5Y cells. In particular, acyl-SG thioesters can prevent the impairment of intracellular ROS scavengers, intracellular ROS accumulation, lipid peroxidation, and apoptotic pathway activation. Palmitoleoyl-SG seemed more effective in cellular protection against A beta-induced oxidative damage than lauroyl-SG, suggesting a valuable role for the monounsaturated fatty acid. In this study, we demonstrate that acyl-SG derivatives completely avoid the sharp lipoperoxidation in primary fibroblasts from familial AD patients occurring after exposure to A beta 42 aggregates. Hence, we put forward these derivatives as new antioxidant compounds which could be excellent candidates for therapeutic treatment of AD and other oxidative stress-related diseases. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据