4.7 Article

Increased expression of Nrf2/ARE-dependent anti-oxidant proteins in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 45, 期 4, 页码 537-546

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.05.011

关键词

anti-oxidant proteins; ARE; ERK; gamma-glutamylcysteine ligase; Nrf2; tamoxifen resistance

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵C6A3404] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acquired resistance to tamoxifen (TAM) is a serious therapeutic problem in breast cancer patients. In this study, we found that the expressions of anti-oxidant proteins (gamma-glutamylcysteine ligase heavy chain (gamma-GCL(h)), heme oxygenase-1, thioredoxin and peroxiredoxin1) in TAM-resistant MCF-7 (TAMR-MCF-7) cells were higher than control MCF-7 cells. Molecular analyses using antioxidant response element (ARE)-containing reporters and gel-shift supported the Critical role of NF-E2-related factor2 (Nrf2)/ARE in the overexpression of antioxidant proteins in TAMR-MCF-7 cells. Intracellular peroxide production was significantly decreased in TAMR-MCF-7 cells and TAM resistance was partially reversed by Nrf2 siRNA. The basal phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and p38 kinase were increased in the TAMR-MCF-7 cells and the inhibition of ERK significantly decreased the activity of minimal ARE reporter and gamma-GCL(h) protein expression in TAMR-MCF-7 cells. However, exposure of TAMR-MCF-7 cells to 17-beta-estradiol or ICI-182,780 did not significantly change gamma-GCL(h) expression. These results suggest that the persistent activation of Nrf2/ARE is critical for the enhanced expression of anti-oxidant proteins in TAM-resistant breast cancer cells and the pathway of ERK, but not of estrogen receptor signaling are involved in the up-regulation of Nrf2/ARE. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据