4.1 Article

Neutrino Oscillations: Entanglement, Energy-Momentum Conservation and QFT

期刊

FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS
卷 41, 期 8, 页码 1279-1306

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10701-011-9545-4

关键词

Neutrino oscillations; Entanglement; Energy-momentum-conservation; QFT

资金

  1. Sonderforschungsbereich TR 27 of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. Alexander von Humboldt foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We consider several subtle aspects of the theory of neutrino oscillations which have been under discussion recently. We show that the S-matrix formalism of quantum field theory can adequately describe neutrino oscillations if correct physics conditions are imposed. This includes space-time localization of the neutrino production and detection processes. Space-time diagrams are introduced, which characterize this localization and illustrate the coherence issues of neutrino oscillations. We discuss two approaches to calculations of the transition amplitudes, which allow different physics interpretations: (i) using configuration-space wave packets for the involved particles, which leads to approximate conservation laws for their mean energies and momenta; (ii) calculating first a plane-wave amplitude of the process, which exhibits exact energy-momentum conservation, and then convoluting it with the momentum-space wave packets of the involved particles. We show that these two approaches are equivalent. Kinematic entanglement (which is invoked to ensure exact energy-momentum conservation in neutrino oscillations) and subsequent disentanglement of the neutrinos and recoiling states are in fact irrelevant when the wave packets are considered. We demonstrate that the contribution of the recoil particle to the oscillation phase is negligible provided that the coherence conditions for neutrino production and detection are satisfied. Unlike in the previous situation, the phases of both neutrinos from Z (0) decay are important, leading to a realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据