4.5 Review

Creating forests with words A review of forest-related discourse studies

期刊

FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS
卷 40, 期 -, 页码 12-20

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.12.005

关键词

Forest; Discourse analysis; Policy analysis; Methods

资金

  1. German Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a new trend in international forest policy science. Over the past decade the term discourse has entered the field. Discourse analytical approaches and methods have become increasingly popular among scholars dealing with forests and their governance. When consulting the growing literature, one quickly notes the inconsistent use of the terms discourse and discourse analysis. On this basis, this paper will provide (1) an overview of discourse approaches in international social and political science literature on forests, (2) identify existing trends and gaps in the literature, and (3) critically assess deficits and opportunities of existing discursive perspectives on forests and their governance. The article is based on a comprehensive survey of sixty-six journal articles, book chapters, books and online publications referring to the terms forest and discourse in the title or key words. The results suggest that forest-related discourse research may benefit from a stronger emphasis on the politics of discourse. In particular, questions of where and by whom discourses are circulated and institutionalised could provide valuable insights into forest governance. In order to arrive at these insights, however, more theoretical and methodological rigour and innovation seem to be required. Consequently, this review suggests that forest-related discourse research would benefit from (1) relating new work to the most recent discourse research conducted in different disciplines and specialisations, (2) boldly testing different available discourse lenses from political science as well as other disciplines, and (3) getting creative in adjusting those lenses (theoretically and methodologically). (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据