4.7 Article

Forest structural attributes after windthrow and consequences of salvage logging

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 289, 期 -, 页码 28-37

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.006

关键词

Windthrow; Salvage logging; Structural attributes; Ecosystem management; Boreal forest

类别

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Laval University Industrial Research Chair in Silviculture and Wildlife
  3. FQRNT (Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Nature et technologies)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the eastern boreal forest of Quebec (Canada) windthrow is a major natural disturbance, given the long fire cycle interval. Understanding windthrow is essential to ecosystem-based forest management. Dead wood, live trees, and pit-and-mound microtopography are major post-windthrow attributes with known ecological importance. So far, these structural post-windthrow attributes have not been described for this ecosystem. In addition, ecological consequences of salvage logging after windthrow remain unknown, with no specific salvage standard being applied to maintain such attributes and biological legacies. In this study, comparisons were made between salvaged and unsalvaged windthrow to identify which post-windthrow attributes were more greatly affected by harvest operations and to clarify management options. Downed coarse woody debris (downed CWD), snags, live trees, and pits and mounds were characterized. We showed that downed CWD and snags diminished after salvage operations, with a more uniform distribution among decay classes. Pit and mound density was reduced after salvage logging compared to unsalvaged windthrow, with pits being smaller in the salvaged plots. From an ecosystem management perspective, retention patches with dead wood and standing living trees should be kept in salvaged cut-blocks. To minimize salvage operation effects on microtopography, machinery trails should be reduced to a minimum. Also, a certain proportion of windthrow should be exempted from logging operations. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据