4.7 Article

Experimental restoration of coppice-with-standards: Response of understorey vegetation from the conservation perspective

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 310, 期 -, 页码 234-241

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.056

关键词

Restoration experiment; Endangered species; Species diversity; Thinning; Traditional woodland management; Woodland conservation

类别

资金

  1. project Coppice forests as the production and biological alternative for the future [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0267]
  2. EC
  3. state budget of the Czech Republic
  4. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [IAA600050812]
  5. European Research Council [278065]
  6. [RVO 67985939]
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [278065] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A substantial part of European lowland woodlands was managed as coppices or wood pastures for millennia. However, traditional management forms were almost completely abandoned in Central Europe by the middle of the 20th century. Combined with the effects of nitrogen deposition and herbivore pressure, shifts in management resulted in biodiversity loss affecting particularly light-demanding oligotrophic plant species. Experimental thinning was applied in a former oak coppice-with-standards in an attempt to restore vanishing understorey plant communities. Two levels of thinning intensity and zero management as control were used on 90 plots. Ten years after the treatment, significant changes in species composition and diversity were observed in heavily thinned plots, while moderate thinning had mostly insignificant effects. Light-demanding oligotrophic species significantly increased, indicating positive consequences of restoration. However, heavy thinning also brought about the expansion of native ruderal species. Alien species remained unchanged. We conclude that the restoration of coppice-with-standards can be an efficient tool to support vanishing light-demanding woodland species. Combined with biodiversity benefits, the increasing demand for biofuel may contribute to the renaissance of traditional management forms in forestry. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据