4.7 Article

Four years of simulated N and S depositions did not cause N saturation in a mixedwood boreal forest ecosystem in the oil sands region in northern Alberta, Canada

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 62-70

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.002

关键词

Nitrogen cycling; Acid deposition; N saturation; Base cation leaching; Boreal forest; Athabasca oil sands region

类别

资金

  1. Alberta Environment
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted a simulated nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition experiment in the Athabasca oil sands region (AOSR) where NOx and SO2 have been emitted from oil sands mining/extracting and upgrading activities and then deposited to the surrounding ecosystems for decades. To evaluate changes in tree growth rates, N pool sizes, and nutrient losses by S and N deposition, the following four treatments were applied: control (CK), N addition (+N, 30 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1)), S addition (+S, 30 kg S ha(-1) yr(-1)), and +NS additions (+NS, 30 kg N and 30 kg S ha(-1)), from 2006 through 2009. Nitrogen addition increased (p < 0.05) tree growth in the +N and +NS treatments, indicating N-limitation in the studied forest, while none of the treatments affected understory growth or soil microbial biomass. The treatments affected inorganic N concentrations in the soil only immediately following N addition. Minimal amounts of NO3- were leached below 45 cm (considered to be below the main rooting zone) of the soil profile in any of the treatments. Decreases in exchangeable Ca2+ and Mg2+ by N and S additions were likely due to increased tree uptake following increased tree growth in the former and increased leaching with sulfate in the latter. Although the lack of significant N leaching indicates that the risk of N saturation was low after 4 yr of elevated N deposition, reduction of exchangeable base cations implies that nutrient imbalance remains a concern in AOSR in the long term. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据