4.7 Article

Comparison of direct and indirect genetic methods for estimating seed and pollen dispersal in Fagus sylvatica and Fagus crenata

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 259, 期 11, 页码 2151-2159

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.03.001

关键词

Parentage analyses; Neighbourhood model; Spatial genetic structure; Isolation by distance; Dispersal kernel

类别

资金

  1. French Bureau des Ressources Genetiques (BRG) [88-2003-2004]
  2. EVOLTREE NoE
  3. ECOGER [2005-2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The comparison between estimates of historical gene flow, using variance in allelic frequencies, and estimates of contemporary gene flow, using parentage assignment, is expected to provide insights into ecological and evolutionary processes at work within and among populations. Genetic variation at microsatellite loci was used to quantify genetic structure in two wind pollinated, gravity and animal-dispersed tree species (Fagus sylvatica L and Fagus crenata Blum.) and to derive historical estimates of gene flow. The gene dispersal distances estimated assuming effective population density to be 1/4 of the observed density were similar to 77 m in European beech and similar to 40 m in Japanese beech. Parentage analyses and a neighbourhood model approach were used to estimate contemporary patterns of seed and pollen dispersal. Our results suggest restricted seed dispersal abilities in both European beech (delta(s) = 10.5 m) and Japanese beech (delta(s) = 12.4 m), with an exponential shaped seed dispersal kernel. A non-negligible rate of seed immigration (m(s) = 27%) was detected in European beech sites but not in Japanese beech site. Pollen dispersal within studied sites also appeared limited (delta(p) = 41.63 m in European beech and delta(p) = 79.4 m in Japanese beech), despite high rate of pollen immigration (m(p) = 68% in European beech and m(p) = 40% m in Japanese beech). Interestingly, contemporary and historical estimates of gene flow were within the same order of magnitude (a few tens of meters). (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据