4.7 Article

Riparian forest and instream large wood characteristics, West Branch Sheepscot River, Maine, USA

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 257, 期 7, 页码 1558-1565

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.024

关键词

Riparian forest; Instream large wood; Restoration; Atlantic salmon

类别

资金

  1. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Maine Atlantic Salmon Conservation Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined riparian forest and instream large wood characteristics in a 2.7 km reach of the West Branch of the Sheepscot River in Maine in order to increase our basic knowledge of these components in a system that is known to have undergone multiple land conversion. The West Branch is approximately 40 km long, drains a 132 km(2) watershed and is vitally important to the remnant population of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and other native species. The riparian forest is comprised of relatively small trees with a mean DBH of 21 cm (SD +/- 10.92) with 56% of the trees having a DBH <20 cm. Balsam fir (Abies balsamea) and red maple (Acer rubrum) are the most common species (54%), and 75% of all trees are short-lived, small diameter species. These data suggest the riparian forest in the West Branch Sheepscot River is dominated by young forest stands, a legacy of land use. During a survey conducted in 2005, 210 pieces of large woody debris (LWD) were identified in the study reach; an average of 78 pieces km(-1). The total volume of pieces was 8.5 m(3) or 3.2 m(3) km(-1) (LWD in this study is defined as pieces >= 10 cm in diameter and >2 m in length). The mean diameter of LWD was 17 cm with 75% of all pieces having a diameter <20 cm. Most pieces were oriented parallel or nearly parallel to the channel and did not appear to influence channel morphology. In contrast, larger pieces were more often in perpendicular or nearly perpendicular orientations, and were more likely to have a pool-forming function. Overall, the reach has low levels of stable large wood, which do not have a major influence on stream habitats. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据