4.7 Article

Photosynthetic response to green crown pruning in young plantation-grown Eucalyptus pilularis and E-cloeziana

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 255, 期 11, 页码 3827-3838

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.030

关键词

Eucalyptus pilularis; Eucalyptus cloeziana; photosynthesis; pruning; up-regulation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The loss of foliage through pruning of live branches may reduce tree growth or it may be compensated by photosynthetic up-regulation of the remaining crown. Here, the changes in light-saturated photosynthesis following pruning to remove 50% of green crown length were examined in 4-year-old Eucalyptus pilularis Sm. and Eucalyptus cloeziana F. Muell. trees. The objectives of the study were to: (1) compare leaf-level physiological (light-saturated photosynthesis (A(max)), stomatal conductance (g), transpiration (Gamma), dark respiration (R-d), quantum yield (Phi), light compensation point (Gamma), water-use efficiency (WUE), nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE)) traits in species with contrasting crown dynamics and structure, (2) examine the effect of crown position on these traits, and (3) examine the effect of pruning on A(max), g, T, WUE, NUE, leaf N and P concentrations and specific leaf area (SLA). Prior to pruning there were no differences in Rd, Gamma and Phi between E. pilularis and E. cloeziana but differences in A(max), T-g, leaf N, leaf P, WUE, NUE and SLA. Whereas the rate of physiological processes (A(max), T, and g) and leaf N and P concentrations increased with crown height, R-d, Gamma, Phi and SLA declined along this vertical gradient, except in the upper crown of E. cloeziana where A(max), T and g were not different to the lower crown. No up-regulation of photosynthesis or changes in leaf physiology occurred between 6 and 13 months after pruning in either species. The results provide an important: basis for modelling pruning effects in process-based tree growth models. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据