4.7 Article

Effects of moisture limitation on tree growth in upland and floodplain forest ecosystems in interior Alaska

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 256, 期 5, 页码 1055-1063

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.022

关键词

boreal forest; summer drought; tree growth; upland; floodplain; Picea glauca; Betula neoalaskana; Populus tremuloides; P. balsomifera

类别

资金

  1. Long-Term Ecological Research
  2. NSF [DEB-0423442]
  3. USDA Forest Service
  4. Pacific Northwest Research Station [PNW01-JV11261952-231]
  5. Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to examine the impact of summer throughfall on the growth of trees, at upland and floodplain locations, in the vicinity of Fairbanks, Alaska. Corrugated clear plastic covers were installed under the canopy of floodplain balsam poplar/white spruce stands and upland hardwood/white spruce stands to control soil moisture recharge as a result of summer precipitation. The covers were installed in 1989 and tree growth measurements were conducted through 2005. Soil moisture dynamics were measured using TDR techniques. Tree basal area growth at dbh in the control plots was approximately twice as high on the floodplain compared to the upland. Summer throughfall exclusion significantly decreased white spruce growth on the floodplain sites but not in the upland sites. In upland sites the melting snow pack is a major moisture resource for tree growth although it is not clear if moisture limitation occurs during the summer in the control plots. However in the floodplain stands white spruce growth was highly dependent on seasonal throughfall even though the ground water table was within the rooting zone and the soils were supplied with a spring recharge due to snowmelt. A number of factors were suggested as a foundation for this strong relationship. These include rooting distribution, soil texture, and the electrical conductivity of the ground water. (c) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据