4.5 Article

Developmental validation of the PowerPlex® Y23 System: A single multiplex Y-STR analysis system for casework and database samples

期刊

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 240-250

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.10.013

关键词

Forensic Science; DNA typing; Short tandem repeat (STR); Y-STR, Polymerase chain reaction (PCR); Validation; PowerPlex (R)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The PowerPlex (R) Y23 System combines the seventeen Y-STR loci in current commercially available Y-STR kits (DYS19, DYS385a/b, DYS389I/II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, DYS393, DYS437, DYS438, DYS439, DYS448, DYS456, DYS458, DYS635, and Y-GATA-H4) with six new highly discriminating Y-STR loci (DYS481, DYS533, DYS549, DYS570, DYS576, and DYS643). These six new loci have higher gene diversities than most of the loci in other commercial Y-STR analysis kits, allowing for further distinction between unrelated male individuals. In addition, the inclusion of two rapidly mutating Y-STR loci may allow for the discrimination of related individuals. The PowerPlex (R) Y23 System is designed to amplify DNA from purified extracts as well as direct amplification from substrates used to collect database samples (e. g. swabs and storage cards). Validation of the PowerPlex (R) Y23 System includes all of the studies required by the FBI and SWGDAM. The results demonstrate that the PowerPlex (R) Y23 System is a robust and reliable amplification kit capable of overcoming high concentrations of commonly encountered inhibitors such as hematin, humic acid, and tannic acid. Full profiles are consistently detected with 62.5 pg of male DNA, even in the presence of excessive amounts of female DNA, establishing the PowerPlex (R) Y23 System as a sensitive method for Y-STR testing. Complete Y-STR profiles are detected from mixed samples with 62.5 pg of male DNA in a background of 400 ng of female DNA or 125 pg of male DNA mixed with 3000 ng of female DNA. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据