4.5 Article

Comparison and classification of methamphetamine seized in Japan and Thailand using gas chromatography with liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase microextraction

期刊

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL
卷 175, 期 2-3, 页码 85-92

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.05.013

关键词

methamphetamine; impurity profiling; GC; Japan; Thailand; SPME

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methamphetamine (MA) is one of the most frequently abused drugs worldwide. The aim of this study is to improve the analytical method for profiling MA impurity in order to compare and classify MA crystals seized in different countries and to investigate the relationships between seizures. To compare MA samples seized in Japan and Thailand, the following analytical method was adopted. A 50 mg sample of MA center dot HCl was dissolved in 1 ml of buffer solution (four parts 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and one part 10% Na2CO3), impurities were extracted with 0.5 ml of ethyl acetate containing four internal standards (n-decane, n-pentadecane, n-eicosane and n-octacosane) and analyzed by gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector on a DB-5 capillary column (0.32 mm i.d. x 30 m, film thickness 1.0 mu m). Fourteen characteristic peaks oil chromatograms were selected for the comparison and classification of samples, and the data were evaluated by the Euclidean distance of the relative peak areas after logarithmic transformation. Sixty-nine samples seized in Japan and 42 seized in Thailand were analyzed. The samples were classified into four groups roughly by cluster analysis. In addition, when it was difficult to compare samples that had fewer impurities on chromatograms obtained from liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was effective. Because many characteristic peaks were detected using SPME, SPME made it easy to compare samples of high purity. The combination of LLE and SPME was useful for impurity profiling of MA samples seized in different countries. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据