4.7 Article

Enhancement of the solubility, stability and bioaccessibility of quercetin using protein-based excipient emulsions

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 30-37

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.062

关键词

Quercetin; Protein; Excipient emulsions; Solubility; Stability; Bioaccessibility

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31601468, 21766018]
  2. Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province, China [20171ACB20005]
  3. Open Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University [SKLF-ZZB-201717]
  4. Postgraduate Innovation Fund of Jiangxi Province [YC2017-B010]
  5. Postgraduate Innovation Fund of Nanchang University [CX2017146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Emulsion-based excipient foods were developed to improve the bioaccessibility of an important hydrophobic nutraceutical: quercetin. Protein-stabilized oil-in-water excipient emulsions were prepared using sodium case-mate, whey protein isolate, or soy protein isolate as an emulsifier. These emulsions were then mixed with powdered quercetin and heated to simulate a cooking process. The excipient emulsions had relatively small droplet sizes (d < 270 nm) and remained stable against coalescence after exposure to boiling (100 degrees C for 60 min). In particular, casein was shown to be better at adsorbing to oil-water interface and contributed to a more stable interfacial layer than the other two proteins. Quercetin was solubilized in the emulsions during heating, which may be attributed to dissolution in the oil phase and complexation with proteins. There were appreciable differences in quercetin bioaccessibility in excipient emulsions stabilized by different emulsifiers (approximate to 74% for casein, 54% for whey protein, 22% for soy protein, and 58% for Tween). This study suggests that milk proteins may be natural alternatives to synthetic surfactants for forming stable excipient emulsions capable of enhancing nutraceutical bioaccessibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据