4.7 Article

A quantitative study on the phenolic compound, tocopherol and fatty acid contents of monovarietal virgin olive oils produced in the southeast region of Brazil

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 62, 期 -, 页码 74-83

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.02.040

关键词

Virgin olive oil; Phenolic compounds; Tocopherols; Fatty acids; Principal component analysis

资金

  1. FAPESP - Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [12/04523-5]
  2. CNPq - Coordenacao Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [140965/2010-6]
  3. CAPES - Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consumption of virgin olive oil (VOO) is highly recommended due to its human health benefits. Brazil is now beginning to experimentally produce VOO, and there are no data on its chemical profile. The aim of this work was to determine the phenolic compound, tocopherol and fatty acid contents of 17 monovarietal VOOs produced from olive varieties cultivated in the southeast region of Brazil during two crop years. The chemical composition of Brazilian VOO resembles that found in the literature for well-established VOOs. The analyzed compounds comprised palmitic acid (6-12%), stearic acid (1.6-2.2%), oleic acid (70-84%), linoleic acid (3.2-11.7%), alpha-linolenic acid (0.6-1.4%), tyrosol (NQ-155 mg kg(-1)), (+)-pinoresinol (2.9-23 mg kg(-1)), hydroxytyrosol (ND-38 mg kg(-1)), luteolin (ND-2.2 mg kg(-1)), alpha-tocopherol (29-233 mg kg(-1)), beta-tocopherol (ND-9.6 mg kg(-1)), and gamma-tocopherol (ND-19 mg kg(-1)). There was a significant difference in the contents of almost all of the analyzed compounds between the two crop years. Principal component analysis demonstrated that some varieties can be differentiated from one another by chemical composition. The results indicated that some Brazilian monovarietal VOOs are promising and that further studies will help to improve the quality of Brazilian VOO. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据