4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Cocoa flavanols show beneficial effects in cultured pancreatic beta cells and liver cells to prevent the onset of type 2 diabetes

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 400-408

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.05.006

关键词

Antioxidant defenses; Dietary polyphenols; HepG2 cells; Ins-1E cells; Oxidative stress

资金

  1. Programa Consolider-Ingenio from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competiveness [CSD2007-00063]
  2. [AGL2010-17579]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetes mellitus is associated with reductions in glutathione, supporting the critical role of oxidative stress in its pathogenesis. Antioxidant food components such as flavonoids have a protective role against oxidative stress-induced degenerative and age-related diseases. Flavonoids constitute an important part of the human diet; they can be found in most plant foods, including green tea, grapes or cocoa and possess multiple biological activities. This article summarizes the latest results obtained with a cocoa phenolic extract (CPE) and its main flavonoid component epicatechin (EC) in cell culture models of beta cells and hepatocytes. The effect of CPE and EC on cell integrity and redox status and their chemo-protective capacity against an oxidative stress induced by tert-butylhydroperoxide (t-BOOH) were tested on pancreatic beta cells as well as cell viability and first elements of the insulin signaling pathway were evaluated in hepatocytes. Doses of 1-20 mu g/mL CPE and 1-20 mu M EC, considered realistic, evoked no damage and preserved the redox status of cultured beta cells and hepatocytes. Treatment of beta cells with CPE/EC significantly prevented the t-BOOH-induced oxidative damage. Besides, treatment of hepatocytes with CPE/EC increased responsiveness to insulin and decreased glucose production. Thus, CPE and EC show favorable effects against a diabetic condition both in pancreatic and hepatic cells. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据