4.7 Article

Nutrient composition and, identification/quantification of major phenolic compounds in Sarcocornia ambigua (Amaranthaceae) using HPLC-ESI-MS/MS

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 404-411

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.11.036

关键词

Sarcocornia ambigua; Halophyte; Phenolic compounds; Antioxidant activity; Mass spectrometry; Minerals

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. CAPES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study systematically investigated the nutritional potential of two different growing populations of Sarcocornia ambigua (salt-tolerant) in terms of nutrients, bioactive compounds, and antioxidant activities. The results revealed that the moisture content represented the largest single component (88.15% and 88.57%) in the proximate composition of both samples of S. ambigua. The mineral present in highest amounts in both samples (on a fresh matter basis) was sodium, followed by potassium, magnesium and then calcium. The antioxidant activity for samples measured by DPPH ranged from 34.64 to 135.83 mu mol TEAC 100 g(-1) and by FRAP from 31.92 to 170.14 mu mol Fe+2 100 g(-1). The fifteen phenolic compounds identified in each extract by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS reveal the presence of one coumarin (scopoletin), one phenolic aldehyde (syringaldehyde), eight phenolic acids (p-coumaric, cinnamic, vanillic, ferulic, caffeic, syringic, sinapic, and chlorogenic acids) and five flavonoids (galangin, quercetin, naringin, kaempferol and isoquercitrin). This information can be useful in determining the possible role of the compounds identified which can participate in the prevention of different health disorders. Further studies are needed to evaluate the bioabsorption and bioavailability of the compounds present in S. ambigua, as well as the interactions between them, after consumption. In summary, the findings of this study highlight the potential of this halophyte as a valuable source of natural antioxidants and nutrients for use in the food and pharmaceutical industries. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据