4.7 Article

Effects of emulsifiers on vegetable-fat based aerated emulsions with interfacial rheological contributions

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 342-351

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.04.027

关键词

Whipping emulsion properties; Emulsifier; Oil and water interfacial properties; Partial coalescence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A relationship between oil/water interfacial properties and the whipping performance of vegetable-fat based o/w emulsions was investigated for two emulsifier mixtures: lactic acid esters of mono and diglycerides (LACTEM), and partially unsaturated/saturated monoglyceride mixture (PUS/SMG). The whipping emulsions were evaluated on storage viscosity, overrun, and firmness. The model interfacial layer between water and oil with LACTEM gave higher shear modulus and the emulsion showed low bulk viscosity, high overrun and high firmness after whipping. The interfacial modulus with PUS/SMG was lower and the emulsion provided higher bulk viscosity, lower overrun and lower firmness. Microscopy and particle size distribution in sheared unwhipped emulsions showed individual fat globules without aggregation in the case with LACTEM, while globules with PUS/SMG became highly aggregated. These suggest that the weaker interfacial layer with PUS/SMG can be more susceptible to the fat crystal mediated partial coalescence of fat globules: Partial coalescence can happen already during quiescent storage. The subsequent whipping led to further aggregation then a strong fat network can help to stabilize air bubbles. The more stable interfacial layer in LACTEM-based emulsions leads to a lower tendency to coalesce during quiescent conditions, and only to aggregation and coalescence during the whipping stage. Fat aggregation was confirmed to be essential in achieving a good aerated structure but there were differences depending on the surface layer properties of fat globules induced by emulsifiers. This caused the rheological differences observed during storage. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据