4.7 Article

Sensory profile and physicochemical characteristics of mango nectar sweetened with high intensity sweeteners throughout storage time

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 1670-1679

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.10.012

关键词

Neotame; Thaumatin; Stevia; External preference mapping; Multiple Factor Analysis; Partial least square

资金

  1. Brazilian Science and Technology Research Council (CNPq)
  2. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to determine the physicochemical characteristics and sensory profile of mango nectar sweetened with different high intensity sweeteners throughout storage time. The mango nectar samples were sweetened with: acesulfame-K/sucralose/neotame blend (100:50:1), sucrose, stevia with 97% rebaudioside, neotame, sucralose and a thaumatin/sucralose blend (1:1). The physicochemical analyses carried out included color (L*, a*, b*), pH, titratable acidity, soluble solids (degrees Brix) and ratio (Brix/titratable acidity). The sensory profile was studied using the Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA). All analyses were carried out at Day zero, 60 days and 120 days of storage. The sensory descriptive and physicochemical data were correlated with an acceptance test by Partial least square (PLS) regression and External preference map (PREFMAP). Changes in sensory profile during storage time were also evaluated using Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) and agreement between configurations was evaluated by Rv coefficient. Sucralose was shown to be the best substitute for sucrose when compared with the other high intensity sweeteners at both zero time and after 120 days of storage. The sample sweetened with sucralose showed acceptance (mean at storage time 6.4) and sensory profile equal to control (sucrose). In addition, the sweeteners stevia with 97% rebaudioside did not show off-flavor and the thaumatin/sucralose blend (1:1) also presented similar acceptance (6.16 at Day zero) and sensory profile in relation to control. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据