4.7 Article

Dairy yeasts produce milk protein-derived antihypertensive hydrolysates

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 203-208

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.05.005

关键词

Debaryomyces hansenii; Kluyveromyces lactis; Kluyveromyces marxianus; Casein-derived peptides; Lactoferrin-derived peptides; ACE inhibition

资金

  1. 'Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia - FEDER' [AGL2010-21009]
  2. Consolider Ingenio
  3. Fun-C-Food [CSD2007-00063]
  4. 'Instituto de Salud Carlos III' [RETICS RD06/0026/0006]
  5. 'Generalitat Valenciana' [ACOMP/2012/011]
  6. INIA [RM2007-00010]
  7. 'Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia' [BES-2011-044424]
  8. CSIC (JAE-PreDoc)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential of 20 dairy yeast strains belonging to Debaryomyces hansenii, Kluyveromyces lactis and Kluyveromyces marxianus species was examined for the production of milk protein-derived antihypertensive hydrolysates. For this purpose yeast strains were grown in microbiological medium with casein or lactoferrin as sole nitrogen source, and the inhibitory effects of casein and lactoferrin hydrolysates (CSHs and LFHs) on angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) activity were determined. Based on the ACE-inhibitory activity, four CSHs and five LFHs were selected, and permeate fractions with molecular masses lower than 3 kDa (pCSHs and pLFHs) were obtained. In vitro ACE-inhibitory potencies (IC50) of permeates varied from 18.8 to 87.6 mu g/ml (pCSHs) and from 50.2 to 500 mu g/ml (pLFHs). K. marxianus Km2 strain grown on either casein or lactoferrin produced the most potent permeates. pCSHs and pLFHs were orally administered to spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) and exerted in vivo antihypertensive effect. In conclusion, the present study contributes to a better insight into bioactive compounds produced by dairy yeasts and shows the feasibility of selected yeasts to produce orally effective antihypertensive milk protein-derived hydrolysates. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据