4.7 Article

A comparison of samples preparation strategies in the multi-elemental analysis of tea by spectrometric methods

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 922-930

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.03.030

关键词

Tea; Sample preparation; Digestion; Spectrometry; Multi-elemental analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tea made from Camellia sinensis plant is one of the most widely consumed beverages worldwide. It is recognized as a rich source of various elements, including those being essential to human health and also toxic that the plant may accidentally take up during the growth period and which can have adverse effects on the human well-being. Due to the habitual drinking of tea infusions, the determination of the mineral content in tea is of a great importance in order to control the quality and the safety of this product or to judge its nutritional value. In general, atomic and mass spectrometries are commonly used for the elemental analysis of tea leaves and commercial teas. Although these analytical techniques are useful in measurements of the total concentration of elements, they usually require samples to be properly pre-treated prior to spectrochemical measurements. Because the sample preparation of tea is the most critical step of the whole analytical chain, this review has been attempted to survey different preparation procedures of tea samples carried out before the element analysis. Common strategies aimed at decomposing samples through dry and wet digestions are described in details and compared in reference to their advantages and drawbacks. Recent, alternative methods of the sample treatment and the analysis by spectrometry techniques are also highlighted. The effect of the selection of certain sample preparation procedures on the reliability of analytical results and manners of the control and the assurance of their quality are also considered. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据