4.7 Article

Controlling W/O/W multiple emulsion microstructure by osmotic swelling and internal protein gelation

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 1613-1620

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.09.035

关键词

W/O/W emulsions; WPI gelation; Osmotic pressure; Dilution factors; Swelling; Diffusion; Coalescence; Reduced fat

资金

  1. AFRI, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture
  2. Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station
  3. Department of Food Science
  4. Higher Education Commission (Pakistan) under the International Research Support Initiative Program (IRSIP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this work was to prepare novel microstructures and textures by controlled osmotic swelling and gelation of multiple (W-1/O/W-2) emulsions. Initially, multiple emulsions were prepared: internal aqueous phase (W-1) containing 20 wt.% whey protein isolate (WPI) in buffer solution (pH 7,250 mM NaCl); oil phase (O) containing 6 wt.% polyglycerol polyricinoleate (PGPR) in soybean oil; and external aqueous phase (W-2) containing 250 mM NaCl and 1 wt.% Tween 80. These W-1/O/W-2 emulsions were then subjected to different degrees of dilution (1:0 to 1:5 with salt-free buffer) and thermal treatment (30 to 90 degrees C) to induce swelling and/or gelation of the internal aqueous phase. W-1/O/W-2 emulsions had appreciably higher viscosities than O/W emulsions with similar fat contents, which was attributed to the increase in effective particle volume associated with the water droplets trapped inside the fat droplets. Heat treatment increased the apparent shear viscosity of the emulsions, which was attributed to thermal denaturation and aggregation of the globular proteins altering the structure and interactions in the system. The strategies used to alter the microstructure and rheology of the multiple emulsions utilized in this study may be useful for the production of foods with novel textures or reduced-fat products. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据