4.7 Article

1H-NMR-based metabolomics approach to understanding the drying effects on the phytochemicals in Cosmos caudatus

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 763-770

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.09.022

关键词

Cosmos caudatus; Metabolomics; Antioxidants; Multivariate data analysis; Flavonoids; NMR

资金

  1. Universiti Putra Malaysia
  2. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) [5450255]
  3. Scientific Chairs Unit of Taibah University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cosmos caudatus, locally known as ulam raja, is a local Malaysian herb traditionally used both as a food and medicinal herb to treat several maladies. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (H-1-NMR) combined with principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least-squares analysis (PLS) was applied to distinguish variations among C. caudatus materials processed with various drying techniques. A discriminatory report on the metabolites responsible for the variation between air (AD), oven (OD) and freeze (FD) dryings of C caudatus samples was successfully achieved using H-1-NMR-based metabolomics. The correlation between antioxidant activity (M) represented by radical DPPH scavenging activity and metabolite variation among processed samples dried in three different ways was also determined by partial least-squares analysis (PLS). The PCA and PLS scores showed a noticeable and clear separation into three clusters representing the three drying methods by PC1 and PC2, with an eigenvalue of 77.9%. Various assigned H-1-NMR chemical shifts referring to the metabolites responsible for sample variation were ascribed. The identified compounds were beta- and alpha-glucose, chlorogenic acid, catechin, rutin, quercetin, quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside, quercetin 3-O-beta-arabinofuranoside and quercetin 3-O-beta-glucoside. This research demonstrates that most of the identified compounds were present in all samples from the three processing methods. However, there was marked variance in the concentration of the constituents present. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据