4.7 Article

Bioactive peptides in water-soluble extracts of ovine cheeses from Southern Brazil and Uruguay

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 322-329

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.05.009

关键词

Ovine cheeses; Bioactive peptides; Antioxidant activity; Antihypertensive activity; Antimicrobial activity

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. CAPES
  3. FAPERGS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water soluble extracts (WSE) of ewe's cheeses produced in Uruguay and Brazil were evaluated for their biological activities. Feta-type, Roquefort-type and Pecorino-type cheeses from Brazil, Pecorino Sardo-type and Cerrillano cheese samples from Uruguay, were analyzed. Antioxidant properties were evaluated using distinct methods. Scavenging of the cation radical of 2,2'-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline)-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) ranged from 32 to 45% for Feta-type cheeses to 87% for Roquefort-type cheese. A similar trend was observed for the reducing power, where WSE from Roquefort-type cheese showed the highest activity among the evaluated cheese. Iron chelating activity was quite variable among the different WSE, being higher (50%) for a Pecorino-type cheese. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) analysis presented similarity among most of the cheese samples, with inhibition values ranging from 25 to 51%. Scavenging of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical was observed only for Roquefort-type cheese. All WSE samples showed a prominent inhibition of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE), ranging from 46% for a Feta-type cheese to 80% for Roquefort-type cheese. No antibacterial activity was observed for the different WSE. The results indicated that the evaluated cheeses could be sources of bioactive peptides with different modes of action. WSE of Roquefort-type cheese showed the best set of biological activities. Nano-ESI-MS/MS analysis allowed the identification of peptides that may contribute to the observed bioactivities. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据