4.7 Review

Vitamin A enrichment: Caution with encapsulation strategies used for food applications

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 469-479

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.09.025

关键词

Vitamin A; Micro and nano-encapsulations; Functional food; Toxicity; Sub-toxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vitamin A is essential for life in mammals: it cannot be synthesized de novo and has to be provided by food. Vitamin A is poorly soluble in water and relatively unstable during food processing and storage. Numerous strategies have been developed to avoid its degradation, originally for pharmaceutical uses and now for nutritional applications. Day after day, increasing development of a lot of premixes containing appropriately protected concentrated vitamin A has been used in enriched and functional foods or in food supplements. We present an update of the principal techniques used for vitamin A encapsulation, their advantages and drawbacks and demonstrate that all of these could efficiently protect vitamin A and consequently, increase its bioavailability. On the other hand, in industrialized countries, vitamin A may be associated with sub-toxic effects due to its accumulation in the liver. Furthermore, it is now generally well agreed that the upper limit intake could be decreased for the elderly despite the known osteoporosis risk in the elderly and the fact that they are known to manifest impaired vitamin A metabolism. In parallel, the new roles of vitamin A in preventive nutrition against neurodegenerative diseases have recently increased the interest in supplementation via functional food or food supplements, This, associated with the increasingly frequent intake of vitamin A in food supplement or enriched food (i.e. with encapsulated vitamin A), leads us to the recommendation that more caution is necessary in the development of food strategies using vitamin A encapsulation, in industrialized countries. (c) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据