4.6 Article

The impact of sugar and fat reduction on perception and liking of biscuits

期刊

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 41-47

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.02.001

关键词

Sweetness; Liking; Biscuit; Reduced sugar; Reduced fat

资金

  1. trade association of French biscuit producers (Collective des Fabricants de Biscuits et Gateaux de France)
  2. Regional Council of Burgundy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reducing the fat and/or sugar content in biscuits can be a way to improve their nutritional composition. Seventy-nine consumers of biscuits were recruited to study the impact of these reductions on liking and perception. Four categories of products were selected from a wide range of biscuits available at the French market. Three to six variants of each type of biscuit were produced based on reduced content of sugar, fat or both. Consumers tested the samples under laboratory conditions (6 sessions), recording their liking during initial sessions and crispiness, sweetness and fat perception during latter sessions. Sugar-reduced biscuits were perceived as less sweet than standard biscuits at low reduction levels, whereas fat-reduced biscuits were perceived as less fatty than standard biscuits at higher reduction levels (except for one biscuit among the three biscuits studied). A reduction in the sugar content had no effect on perception of fat, whereas a reduction in the fat content sometimes induced a reduced sweetness perception. For most of the biscuits studied, the least appreciated variants were those perceived as (1) less sweet, (2) less sweet and less fatty or (3) less sweet and less crispy than standard biscuits. Moreover, the variants only perceived as less fatty were not significantly disliked. These results suggest that from a sensory point of view, it is more acceptable to reduce the fat than the sugar content in biscuits, at least when products are not perceived as being less sweet. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据