4.6 Article

Priming effects of an olfactory food cue on subsequent food-related behaviour

期刊

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 274-281

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.06.008

关键词

Priming; Food choice; Odour; Olfactory food cue; Implicit concept activation

资金

  1. Burgundy region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies in cognitive psychology have highlighted a link between perception and action, by revealing the non-conscious influence that a cue can have on thinking and doing. The present study aimed at exploring whether an olfactory food cue could have an impact on food choices. We chose fruity odours as olfactory food cues, in order to examine if this kind of olfactory cue could lead individuals to choose fruit and vegetables. In the first experiment, 58 participants were assigned randomly to either a control or a melon-scent condition. In the melon-scent condition, they were unobtrusively exposed to a melon odorant in a waiting room, while in the control condition the room was non-odorized. Then, they all performed a lexical decision task and a task involving choices from a menu. The results showed that participants in the melon-scent condition answered faster only for the word 'melon' in comparison with other tested words. Moreover, participants in the melon-scent condition were more likely than control participants to choose starters with vegetables, but not main courses or desserts with fruit and vegetables. Seventy participants took part in the second experiment, in which we replicated the same protocol, but using a pear odorant as the cue. The results showed that participants in the pear-scent condition were significantly more likely than those in the control condition to choose desserts with fruit, but not starters or main courses with vegetables. These results indicate that the non-conscious perception of a fruity odour may activate a 'fruit and vegetables' concept, but also a concept of the context of consumption. Moreover, they support the idea of priming effects 'specific to a food cue'. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据