4.7 Article

Microbial spoilage investigation of thawed common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) stored at 2 degrees C using next generation sequencing and volatilome analysis

期刊

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 518-525

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2018.08.004

关键词

Cephalopods; Cuttlefish; Spoilage microbiota; 16S rRNA; Next generation sequencing (NGS); Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cephalopods are highly appreciated with increasing demand seafood, but are also very perishable and deteriorate fast mainly due to microbiological spoilage. For this reason exploration of bacterial communities through 16S Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) analysis was performed. Furthermore, sensory evaluation, classical microbiological analysis, Total Volatile Base-Nitrogen/TVB-N and Trimethylamine-Nitrogen/TMA-N determination were also carried out. Shelf-life of thawed cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) stored at 2 degrees C determined by sensory evaluation was 4 days. Aerobic Plate Counts (APC) reached the levels of 6.6 log cfu/g. The initial and final population of all spoilage microorganisms enumerated with selective media was under detectable levels with the exception of Pseudomonas. Based on 16S NGS analysis, Psychrobacter were the dominants among others, e.g. Pseudomonas, Shewanella, Comamonas, Carnobacterium, Vagococcus, of the initial microbiota. Psychrobacter was also the dominant microorganisms of the spoiled cuttlefish. TVB-N and TMA-N increased considerably only at the late stages of storage. A plethora of VOCs were produced and some exhibited an increasing profile throughout storage, making them promising molecules as freshness indicators in contrast to TVB-N and TMA-N. The application of next generation sequencing revealed the microbiota that escapes the classic microbiological methodologies, showing that other microorganisms different from those determined on selective culture media might be the main cause of microbiological spoilage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据