4.7 Article

Levansucrase and sucrose phoshorylase contribute to raffinose, stachyose, and verbascose metabolism by lactobacilli

期刊

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 278-284

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.03.003

关键词

Raffinose-family-oligosaccharides; Lactobacilli; alpha-Galactosidase; Levansucrase; Gluten-free bread

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. Canada Research Chairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs) in food are considered anti-nutritional factors. This study elucidated the role of alpha-galactosidase (alpha-Gal), levansucrase, and sucrose phosphorylase for conversion of RFOs by lactobacilli. Quantification of gene expression by reverse-transcriptase quantitative PCR revealed that expression of levansucrase and sucrose phosphorylase by Lactobacillus reuteri is increased more than 100 fold when sucrose or raffinose are available. Fava bean (Vicia faba) or field pea (Pisum sativum) flours were fermented with alpha-Gal positive L. reuteri or alpha-Gal negative Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis. Isogenic strains lacking levansucrase activity, a L. reuteri ftfA mutant and a L sanfranciscensis levS mutant, were used for comparison. During growth in pulse flours, L. sanfranciscensis accumulated melibiose and alpha-galactooligosaccharides (alpha-GOSs); the levansucrase-negative strain did not grow. L reuteri metabolized raffinose, stachyose, and verbascose by levansucrase activity and accumulated alpha-GOSs as metabolic intermediates. Oligosaccharide metabolism in the levansucrase-negative mutant was slower, and accumulation of alpha-GOSs was not observed. The use of sorghum sourdough fermented with L reuteri LTH5448 and bean flour in gluten-free baking converted RFOs to alpha-GOSs by levansucrase and invertase activities. In conclusion, the elucidation of the role levansucrase in RFO metabolism by lactobacilli allowed the conversion or hydrolysis of RFOs in food fermentations. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据