4.7 Article

Fabrication, characterization and lipase digestibility of food-grade nanoemulsions

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 355-363

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.10.014

关键词

Nanoemulsions; Homogenization; Solvent evaporation; Physicochemical properties; In vitro digestion; Delivery systems

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture
  2. Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station
  3. Department of Food Science
  4. Fondecyt [1095199]
  5. CONICYT (Chile)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The behavior of nanoemulsion-based delivery systems within the gastrointestinal tract determines their functional performance. In this study, the influence of particle radius (30-85 nm) on the in vitro digestion of nanoemulsions containing non-ionic surfactant stabilized lipid (corn oil) droplets was examined using simulated small intestine conditions. Nanoemulsions were prepared by a combination of high-pressure homogenization and solvent (hexane) displacement. Lipid droplets with different sizes were prepared by varying the oil-to-solvent ratio in the disperse phase prior to homogenization. The fraction of free fatty acids (FFA) released from emulsified triacylglycerols (TG) during digestion was measured by an in vitro model (pH-Stat titration). Nanoemulsions exhibited a lag-period before any FFA were released, which was explained by inhibition of lipase adsorption to the oil-water interface by free surfactant. After the lag-period, the digestion rate increased with decreasing oil droplet diameter (increasing specific surface area). The total amount of FFA released from the emulsions increased from 61% to 71% as the mean droplet radius decreased from 86 nm to 30 nm. The incomplete digestion of the emulsified lipids could be explained by inhibition of lipase activity by the release of fatty acids and/or by interactions between lipase and surfactants molecules. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据