4.7 Article

Characteristics of gelatin from the skin of unicorn leatherjacket (Aluterus monoceros) as influenced by acid pretreatment and extraction time

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 381-388

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.07.004

关键词

Unicorn leatherjacket; FTIR; Gel strength; Zeta potential; Gelatin; Pretreatment; Extraction

资金

  1. Graduate School
  2. Songkla University
  3. TRF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gelatins from the skin of unicorn leatherjacket (Aluterus monoceros) pretreated with different acids (0.2 M acetic acid or 0.2 M phosphoric acid) and extracted with distilled water at 45 degrees C for various times (4 and 8 h) were characterized. Yields of 5.23-9.18 or 6.12-11.54% (wet weight basis) were obtained for gelatins extracted from the skin pretreated with 0.2 M acetic acid or 0.2 M phosphoric acid, respectively. Extracted gelatins contained alpha(1) and alpha(2) chains as the predominant components and some degradation peptides. The absorption bands of gelatins in FTIR spectra were mainly situated in the amide band region (amide I, amide II and amide III) and showed the significant loss of molecular order of triple helix. Gelatin samples had a relative solubility greater than 90% in the wide pH ranges (1-10). The gel strength of gelatin from skin pretreated with phosphoric acid (GPA) was higher than that of gelatin from skin pretreated with acetic acid (GAA). Both GPA and GAA had the lower gel strength than that of commercial bovine gelatin (P<0.05). Net charge of GAA and GPA became zero at pHs of 6.64-7.15 and 6.78-7.26, respectively, as determined by zeta potential titration. Emulsifying and foaming properties of GAA and GPA increased with increasing concentrations (1-3%, w/v). Those properties were governed by pretreatments and extraction time. Thus gelatin can be successfully extracted from unicorn leatherjacket skin using the appropriate acid pretreatment and extraction time. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据