4.7 Article

Portuguese consumers' attitudes and perceptions of bivalve molluscs

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 168-177

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.01.017

关键词

Consumer survey; Bivalves; Clams; Preferences; Attitudes

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [SFRH/BD/69274/2010]
  2. Ciencia Program of FCT
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/69274/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bivalves have been promoted as healthy food in many countries. Yet, little information is available about bivalve consumers' purchasing behaviour and attitudes. The aim of this study was to investigate the marketing and quality aspects of several bivalve species with economical value in Portugal and to examine the relationship between each respondent's demographic and socio-economic status with bivalve consumption attitudes and preferences. A randomly selected sample of 1778 people answered a web-based questionnaire. The majority of respondents claimed to consume clams (pullet carpet shell clam and Japanese carpet shell clam) and usually prefer bivalves from national production. Smell, size and cleaned shells were considered as the most important criteria when choosing live bivalves. Most consumers buy clams in supermarkets and revealed good knowledge about the risks associated with its consumption. Trust in the selling establishment and product's label information was the main perceived quality criteria associated to bivalve purchasing. Nonetheless, consumers' attitudes and preferences differed considerably according to their demographic and socio-economic characteristics. The current findings provide a useful tool for producers and stakeholders involved in the trade chain of bivalves to understand the consumption profile and the most important quality criteria involved in bivalve purchase. Additionally, it is an important tool to predict the risks of bivalve consumption as well as to understand the different scenarios of contamination occurring in harvesting areas by national competent authorities. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据