4.7 Article

Evaluation of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the determination of patulin in apple juices using micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 353-358

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.11.003

关键词

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Patulin; Apple juice; Micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography

资金

  1. Junta de Andalucia [P07-AGR-03178]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patulin (PAT) is a mycotoxin naturally found in fruits, including apples. Its occurrence as a natural contaminant of fruit juices is indicative of fruit quality in production. The European Union has set the maximum content of patulin in 50 mu g kg(-1) for fruit juices and 10 mu g kg(-1) for infant fruit juices. In this paper, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) has been proposed for the extraction and preconcentration of PAT in apple juice, followed by its determination by micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) with diode-array detection. PAT has been analyzed in the presence of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), which is the main interference in this kind of matrix. Variables affecting DLLME efficiency were optimized and the calibration curve was established for PAT in analyte standard solutions, applying the DLLME-MEKC procedure. The limit of detection was 0.6 mu g L-1 and recoveries obtained for spiked freshly-made apple juice samples at four different concentration levels (5, 20, 50 and 75 mu g L-1), were above 75% with RSD lower than 9%. This method can be classified as a green alternative, being successfully applied to the measurement of 19 apple juice samples obtained from different suppliers and supermarkets. The optimized DLLME-MEKC method is free from matrix effects and avoids the tedious matrix-matched or standard addition calibration method. Almost fifty percent of the samples were contaminated with a PAT content greater than the maximum content established by the European regulation. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据