4.7 Article

Investigation on the knowledge associated with foodborne diseases in consumers of northeastern Portugal

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 54-57

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.028

关键词

Cross-contamination; Foodborne diseases; Foodborne pathogens; Knowledge

资金

  1. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Ministry of Education and Science, Portugal
  2. [PEst-OE/AGR/UI0772/2011]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PEst-OE/AGR/UI0772/2011] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Foodborne diseases represent a widespread and growing public health problem worldwide. The global occurrence of these diseases is difficult to calculate, but high levels of mortality have been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge of food handler's and consumers concerning foodborne diseases, personal hygiene, risk groups, temperature control, cross-contamination and cleaning in the municipality of Mirandela, northeastern Portugal. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire from a convenience sample of 400 adults aged 18 years or older. The majority of respondents had a level of knowledge regarded as sufficient about the control of temperature in food. In addition, participants also demonstrated to be well informed on measures of hygiene. Most of the participants correctly answered questions about knowledge related to cross-contamination. This survey showed that there is a gap in the consumers' knowledge on foodborne microbiological and parasitological agents. The respondents with a lower level of public education presented significantly higher knowledge than participants with an academic degree. In conclusion, in order to reduce occurrence, it is necessary to continue improving the knowledge on foodborne diseases, not only for the final consumer but also throughout of the whole production and distribution chain, as well as in restaurants. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据