4.7 Article

Rapid detection of viable Listeria monocytogenes in chilled pork by real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 117-124

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.10.025

关键词

Listeria monocytogenes; Real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR; Detection; RNA; Chilled pork

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2009DFA 31770]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31071614]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to develop an RNA-dependent real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR (real-time RT-PCR) method for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in chilled pork without the need for pre-enrichment steps, and the soundness of the method was simultaneously validated and evaluated by DNA-based real-time PCR and traditional culture methods. For specificity testing, a lack of amplification signals and no Tm peak at similar to 78.37 degrees C were obtained from any of 41 other bacterial strains associated with meat species under the conditions used. The R-2 and efficiency of standard curves constructed by ten-fold serial dilutions of pure L monocytogenes were respectively 0.995 and 90.1%; lower than that of the DNA-based assay. The detection limit was up to 10(0) cfu/mL in both pure culture and in artificially contaminated chilled pork samples. Quantitative detection showed that the RNA-based assay obtained relatively accurate results when samples had undergone treatments (such as high pressure), but without treatment, the results showed a slight deviation compared with plate counts. The RNA-dependent real-time RT-PCR method developed in this study was found to be rapid and sensitive and should be useful for reliable detection of viable L. rnonocytogenes in chilled pork, especially for pre-treated samples. However, this method cannot be recommended to accurately quantify L monocytogenes, but only to show the presence of live cells and approximately predict its level of contamination. (c) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据