4.7 Article

In vitro digestibility of bovine β-casein with simulated and human oral and gastrointestinal fluids. Identification and IgE-reactivity of the resultant peptides

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 514-521

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.110

关键词

Milk allergy; beta-Casein; In vitro digestion; Human digestive fluids; IgE; Peptide microarray

资金

  1. COST-Infogest FA [1005]
  2. CYTED-IBEROFUN [110AC0386]
  3. CSIC
  4. [AGL2011-24740]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stability during digestion is considered an important feature in determining the allergenicity of food proteins. This study aimed to provide an immunological characterisation of the digestion products of the major cow's milk allergen beta-casein (beta-CN) produced by in vitro orogastrointestinal hydrolysis with simulated and human digestive fluids. beta-CN was unaffected by oral digestion, but quickly broke down during the early stages of gastric digestion. The degradation with human fluids was faster than that with commercial enzymes. There were similarities in the peptide patterns of the hydrolysates produced in both models, showing 20 peptides in common after gastric digestion. After gastroduodenal digestion, the human fluids gave less numerous and shorter peptides. The IgE binding of most of the individual sera used to the hydrolysates produced with simulated and human fluids increased at the end of the gastric phase and decreased when the duodenal digestion was completed. Two IgE-binding synthetic peptides: beta-CN (57-68) and beta-CN (82-93), which matched fragments released by beta-CN following in vitro digestion with simulated and human fluids, consisted of the most immunoreactive areas of the protein. The similarities found between the in vitro simulated digestion system and that using human digestive fluids suggest that the former would provide a reasonably good estimation of the potential allergenicity of protein digests. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据