4.7 Article

Effect of high pressure treatments on the physicochemical properties of a sulphur dioxide-free red wine

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 141, 期 3, 页码 2558-2566

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.022

关键词

Colour; Phenolic compounds; Anthocyanins; Sensorial analyses; High pressure

资金

  1. QREN - SI I&DT Co-Promocao WineSulFree [3462]
  2. FCT - WineSulFree [PTDC/AGR-ALI/101251/2008]
  3. Research Unit QOPNA [62/94, PEst-541 C/QUI/UI0062/2011]
  4. FCT [SFRH/BPD/46584/2008, SFRH/BD/70066/2010]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/46584/2008, SFRH/BD/70066/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) in winemaking for substitution of the use of sulphur dioxide is still at a very early stage of development, since knowledge about the effect on physicochemical and sensorial characteristics of the wine during storage is very scarce. In this work, the evolution of colour, antioxidant activity and total phenolic compounds of SO2-free red wines treated by HHP and aged in bottles was followed for 12 months. The pressurised wines were compared with wine samples prepared with addition of 40 ppm of SO2 and without any of these two treatments. After 12 months, the pressurised wines presented higher values of CIELab parameters (a*, b*, and L*) and a lower monomeric anthocyanin content (45-61%) when compared to the unpressurised ones. The pressurised wines showed also a better global sensorial assessment, with the pressure treatments imparting aged-like characteristics to the wines. The wine deposits of pressurised wines had higher total phenolic content, namely proanthocyanidins (3- to 10-fold). The results demonstrate that HHP can influence long term red wine physicochemical and sensorial characteristics, hypothesised to be due to an increase of condensation reactions of phenolic compounds, forming compounds with higher degree of polymerisation that became insoluble in wine along storage. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据