4.7 Article

Preparation and anti-influenza A virus activity of κ-carrageenan oligosaccharide and its sulphated derivatives

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 133, 期 3, 页码 880-888

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.01.108

关键词

kappa-Carrageenan oligosaccharide; Sulphated derivative; Influenza A virus; Structure-activity relationship; Pulmonary viral titre; Interferon

资金

  1. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0944]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31070724, 31000830]
  3. The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [201113013]
  4. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2011HQ012]
  5. Special Fund for Marine Scientific Research in the Public Interest [201005024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carrageenans, the sulphated galactans derived from red algae, are attracting increasing interest in developing potential anti-viral drugs. In this study, low molecular weight kappa-carrageenan oligosaccharides (KCO) and their sulphated derivatives (KCO-S) were prepared, and their anti-influenza A virus (IAV) properties were investigated. The results indicated that KCO and KCO-S could effectively inhibit IAV multiplication in MDCK cells in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, a structure-activity relationship study showed that the degree of sulphation and molecular weight were the main factors that influenced the anti-IAV activity of kappa-carrageenan oligosaccharide. The most active kappa-carrageenan oligosaccharide had a sulphate content of 0.8-1.0 mole/mole of disaccharide and a molecular weight of 1-3 kDa. In addition, KCO and KCO-S could significantly improve survival and decrease pulmonary viral titres in IAV-infected mice. Moreover, the antiviral effect of KCO and KCO-S does not seem to be dependent on the interferon system. In conclusion, carrageenan oligosaccharide and its sulphated derivative have good inhibitory actions on IAV replication in vitro and in vivo. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据