4.7 Article

Optimization of ionic liquid based ultrasonic assisted extraction of puerarin from Radix Puerariae Lobatae by response surface methodology

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 135, 期 4, 页码 2299-2306

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.038

关键词

Ionic liquid; Ultrasonic assisted extraction; Puerarin; Radix Puerariae Lobatae; Optimization; Response surface methodology

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20806037, 20876131]
  2. Jiangxi Province Young Scientists (Jinggang Star) Cultivation Plan [20112BCB23002]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi, China [2007GQH1752]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province Department of Education [GJJ09420]
  5. Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Ecology and Bio-Resource Utilization of Ministry of Education [Z04998]
  6. Special Funds for Graduate Student Innovation in Jiangxi Province [YC09B012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ionic liquid (IL) based ultrasonic assisted extraction (ILUAE) was developed for the effective extraction of puerarin from Radix Puerariae Lobatae (RPL). The ILUAE parameters including the type of ILs, IL concentration, RPL amount, ultrasonic power and time were optimized by single-factor experiment and response surface methodology. Under the optimized experimental conditions, the best results were obtained using RPL amount 0.43 g in 10 mL 1.06 mol L-1 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide aqueous solution, ultrasonic time 27.43 min and ultrasonic power 480 W. Scanning electron microscope images of RPL samples were obtained to provide visual evidence of the sonication effect. Compared with the conventional ultrasonic assisted extraction and refluent extraction, the proposed ILUAE offered shorter extraction time and remarkable higher efficiencies due to the higher penetration ability and solubility of IL and the cavitation phenomenon produced in the solvent by the passage of an ultrasonic wave, which further supported the suitability of the proposed approach. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据