4.7 Article

Aroma profile of Garnacha Tintorera-based sweet wines by chromatographic and sensorial analyses

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 134, 期 4, 页码 2313-2325

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.03.105

关键词

Sweet wines; Naturally grape dehydration process; Fortification with spirits; Aging; Vitis vinifera L cv. Garnacha Tintorera

资金

  1. EU FEDER
  2. Galician Regional Government [INCITE09-383-322-PR]
  3. Isidro Parga Pondal
  4. Lucas Labrada research program
  5. Spanish Ministry of Education through the FPU research program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aroma profiles obtained of three Garnacha Tintorera-based wines were studied: a base wine, a naturally sweet wine, and a mixture of naturally sweet wine with other sweet wine obtained by fortification with spirits. The aroma fingerprint was traced by GC-MS analysis of volatile compounds and by sensorial analysis of odours and tastes. Within the volatiles compounds, sotolon (73 mu g/L) and acetoin (122 mu g/L) were the two main compounds found in naturally sweet wine. With regards to the odorant series, those most dominant for Garnacha Tintorera base wine were floral, fruity and spicy. Instead, the most marked odorant series affected by off-vine drying of the grapes were floral, caramelized and vegetal-wood. Finally, odorant series affected by the switch-off of alcoholic fermentation with ethanol 96% (v/v) fit for human consumption followed by oak barrel aging were caramelized and vegetal-wood. A partial least square test (PLS-2) was used to detect correlations between sets of sensory data (those obtained with mouth and nose) with the ultimate aim of improving our current understanding of the flavour of Garnacha Tintorera red wines, both base and sweet. Based on the sensory dataset analysis, the descriptors with the highest weight for separating base and sweet wines from Garnacha Tintorera were sweetness, dried fruit and caramel (for sweet wines) vs. bitterness, astringency and geranium (for base wines). (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据