4.7 Article

Kinetic modelling of drying and conversion/degradation of isoflavones during infrared drying of soybean

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 133, 期 3, 页码 946-952

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.02.010

关键词

Effective diffusivity; First-order reaction; Gas-fired infrared drying; Inter-conversion and degradation; Mathematical modelling

资金

  1. Commission on Higher Education (CHE)
  2. Thailand Research Fund (TRF)
  3. Center of Advanced Studies in Industrial Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soy isoflavones, which are well-known for their health benefits, could be affected by the technique and condition that are used to dry soybean prior to its use. In this study the drying kinetics of soybean as well as the inter-conversion and degradation of soy isoflavones during gas-fired infrared combined with hot air vibrating drying (GFIR-HAVD) at various temperatures (50, 70, 130 and 150 degrees C) were investigated. Simple kinetic models for the evolutions of both moisture content and isoflavones were proposed and tested. The temperature dependency of the effective moisture diffusivity of soybean could be well described by the Arrhenius correlation with the activation energy of 13.88 kJ/mol. In terms of the evolutions of isoflavones the contents of 6 ''-0-malonylgenistin (MCI) and 6 ''-0-acetylgenistin (AGI) decreased, while genistin (GI) and genistein increased with an increase in the drying temperature and drying time. First-order kinetic models could be used to describe the changes of isoflavones. At all drying temperatures the conversion of MCI to GI exhibited the highest rate constant; this was followed by the conversion of AGI to GI. In addition, MCI had the highest degradation rate constant; this was followed, in descending order, by AGI, Gland GE. The activation energies of degradation were lower than those of inter-conversion among all forms of isoflavones. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据