4.7 Article

Separation and characterisation of proanthocyanidins in Virginia type peanut skins by LC-MSn

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 131, 期 3, 页码 927-939

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.09.081

关键词

Electrospray mass spectrometry; Liquid chromatography; Proanthocyanidin; Peanut skin

资金

  1. Biodesign and Bioprocessing Research Center (BBRC) of Virginia Tech.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proanthocyanidins were extracted from peanut skins, an agricultural waste product of Virginia. Proanthocyanidin composition of single solvent and multistep extraction procedures of peanut skins were compared by HPLC-UV-vis absorbance. The multistep extraction procedure yielded more proanthocyanidin peaks and larger peak areas. Thus this extraction procedure was chosen for subsequent fractionation. Fractionation was performed by size exclusion (Toyopearl HW-40S) and normal phase (NP) (porous silica) high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) before reversed phase (RP) electrospray ionisation liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (ESI-LC-MSn). Proanthocyanidin separation on the NP column was better overall, compared to size exclusion chromatography, and thus was chosen for characterisation by MS. Peanut skin procyanidins were found to separate in order of increasing molecular weight on the NP column. The ESI-MS generated positive and negative molecular-type ions and their dissociation product ions were used to identify specific proanthocyanidins and procyanidins. New proanthocyanidin dimeric and trimeric species were identified. These species consisted of one or two (epi)catechin units bound to luteolin or kaempferol. Monomers through nonamers of flavan-3-ols were identified by retention time and their multistep (MSn) dissociation pathway. Hexamers were identified as both singly and doubly charged negative ions, [M-zH](z-), z = 1 or 2. Species of greater than pentamers were tentatively identified due to their low ionisation efficiency and significant overlap of species both chromatographically and in the MS spectra. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据