4.7 Article

Solvent-free microwave extraction of essential oil from Dryopteris fragrans and evaluation of antioxidant activity

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 133, 期 2, 页码 437-444

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.01.056

关键词

Solvent-free microwave extraction; Dryopteris fragrans; Essential oil; Antioxidant activity; Response surface methodology

资金

  1. Special Fund of Forestry Industrial Research for Public Welfare of China [201004040]
  2. Program for Importation of International Advanced Forestry Science and Technology
  3. National Forestry Bureau [2012-4-06]
  4. Heilongjiang Province Science Foundation for Excellent Youths [JC200704]
  5. Project for Distinguished Teacher Abroad
  6. Chinese Ministry of Education [MS2010DBLY031]
  7. NEFU Foundation [GRAP09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solvent-free microwave extraction (SFME) of the essential oil from Dryopteris fragrans and its antioxidant activity were investigated. A central composite design combined with response surface methodology was applied to study the influences of extraction time, irradiation power and humidity (proportion of water pretreatment). A maximal extraction yield of 0.33% was achieved under optimal conditions of extraction time 34 min, irradiation power 520W and humidity 51%. Sixteen compounds, representing 89.65% of the oil, were identified, of which the major ones, (1R,4S,11R)-4,6,6,11-tetramethyltricyclo[5.4.0.0(4,8)] undecan-l-ol (30.49%), 1R,45,7S,11R-2,2,4,8-tetramethyltricyclo15.3.1.0(4,11)]undec-8-ene (22.91%) and, 1,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethy1-1-naphthalenemethanol (15.11%), accounted for 68.51% of the oil. The antioxidant activity of the essential oil was assessed by 2,2-dipheny1-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), beta-caroteneflinoleic acid, and reducing power assay, the IC50 values were 0.19, 0.09 and 0.18 mg/mL, respectively. All these results suggest that SFME represents an excellent alternative protocol for production of essential oils from plant materials. 0 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据