期刊
FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 134, 期 4, 页码 2303-2312出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.03.096
关键词
Headspace GC-MS fingerprinting; Novel processing; High pressure (HP) processing; Pulsed electric field (PEF) processing; Orange juice
资金
- Commission of the European Communities [FP6-CT-2006-015710]
- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
As a rule, previous studies have generally addressed the comparison of novel and traditional processing technologies by a targeted approach, in the sense that only the impact on specific quality attributes is investigated. By contrast, this work focused on an untargeted strategy, in order to take into account unexpected and unintended effects of (novel) processing, and to possibly uncover unknown compounds resulting from alternative processing. The potential of headspace GC-MS fingerprinting was explored as a tool to compare the impact of thermal, high pressure (HP) and pulsed electric field (PEF) processing for mild pasteurisation of orange juice. This study demonstrated that when processing conditions are selected based on equivalent microbial safety, the impact of heat, HP and PEF pasteurisation on the volatile profile of orange juice can be considered comparable. During refrigerated storage, however, indirect impact differences were revealed, which were attributed to differences in degree of enzyme inactivation. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据