4.7 Article

Commercial extract of the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum enhances phenolic antioxidant content of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) which protects Caenorhabditis elegans against oxidative and thermal stress

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 124, 期 1, 页码 195-202

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.008

关键词

Spinacia oleracea L; Ascophyllum nodosum; Total antioxidant capacity; Polyphenols; Flavonoids; Caenorhabditis elegans; Free radicals; Stress resistance

资金

  1. Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture & Marketing (NSDAF)
  4. Acadian Seaplants Limited
  5. AAFC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is considerable interest to enhance the nutritional quality of fresh produce especially vegetables. The effects of root treatment of spinach with commercial extracts of the brown macro alga, Ascophyllum nodosum (ANE) on antioxidant level of spinach were studied. At the concentration of 1.0 g/L, ANE treatment significantly increased the total phenolics and flavonoids content, total antioxidant activity (as measured by DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging capacity) and Fe2+ chelating ability in spinach leaves. The H-1 NMR and LC-MS analyses of spinach extract suggests that the increased antioxidant activity is largely associated with flavonoids. The biological effect of ANE-enhanced polyphenols was tested using the Caenorhabditis elegans nematode model. The extracts from ANE-treated spinach significantly improved the survival of the animals under oxidative stress by 50% and high temperature stress by 61% as compared to the extracts from untreated plants (0% and 38%, respectively). Taken together, the results suggest that ANE stimulate flavonoid synthesis in spinach leaf thus enhancing its nutritional quality. Furthermore, the increased flavonoid content exerts beneficial effects in C elegans against oxidative and heat stress. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据