4.7 Article

Isolation and characterisation of collagen extracted from the skin of striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus)

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 124, 期 1, 页码 97-105

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.05.111

关键词

Acid soluble collagen (ASC); Pepsin soluble collagen (PSC); Zeta potential; FTIR; DSC; Striped catfish; Fish skin

资金

  1. Graduate School, Prince of Songkla University
  2. National Research Council of Thailand
  3. TRF Senior Research Scholar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acid soluble collagen (ASC) and pepsin soluble collagen (PSC) from the skin of striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) were isolated and characterised. The yields of ASC and PSC were 5.1% and 7.7%, based on the wet weight of skin, respectively, with the accumulated yield of 12.8%. Both ASC and PSC comprising two different alpha-chains (alpha 1 and alpha 2) were characterised as type I and contained imino acid of 206 and 211 imino acid residues/1000 residues, respectively. Peptide maps of ASC and PSC hydrolysed by either lysyl endopeptidase or V8 protease were slightly different and totally differed from those of type 1 calf skin collagen, suggesting some differences in amino acid sequences and collagen structure. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of both ASC and PSC were almost similar and pepsin hydrolysis had no marked effect on the triple-helical structure of collagen. Both ASC and PSC had the highest solubility at acidic pH. A loss in solubility was observed at a pH greater than 4 or when NaCl concentration was higher than 2% (w/v). T-max of ASC and PSC were 39.3 and 39.6 degrees C, respectively, and shifted to a lower temperature when rehydrated with 0.05 M acetic acid. Zeta potential studies indicated that ASC and PSC exhibited a net zero charge at pH 4.72 and 5.43, respectively. Thus. ASC and PSC were slightly different in terms of composition and structure, leading to somewhat different properties. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据