4.7 Article

Impact of edible coatings and packaging on quality of white asparagus (Asparagus officinalis, L.) during cold storage

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 117, 期 1, 页码 55-63

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.076

关键词

White asparagus spears quality; Edible coatings; Texture; Anthocyanins; Lignification

资金

  1. General Secretariat of Research and Technology
  2. Greek Ministry of Development
  3. State Scholarship Foundation (IKY)
  4. [PAVET 05 189]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of edible coatings and plastic packaging on quality aspects of refrigerated white asparagus spears were studied using two different experimental protocols. The first included four coating formulations based on carboxymethyl-cellulose and sucrose fatty acid esters, whey protein isolate alone and in combination with stearic acid, and pullulan and sucrose fatty acid esters, and an uncoated sample serving as a control. The second set consisted of four treatments; uncoated asparagus spears (control), coated with a carboxymethyl-cellulose formulation, packaged in plastic packaging and combination of coated and packaged asparagus spears. All products were stored at 4 degrees C and the quality parameters such as weight loss, texture, visual appearance, lignin and anthocyanins concentration, and colour were evaluated during their storage. Edible coatings exhibited a beneficial impact on the quality of asparagus by retarding moisture loss, reducing hardening in their basal part and slowing down the purple colour development. The plastic packaging had a remarkable influence in reducing weight loss and retarding hardening but its impact to the rest of the quality parameters was similar to that of the edible coatings. The combination of packaging and edible coating did not seem to offer any additional advantage on asparagus spears apart from the fact that the product had a brighter appearance at the middle part of the stem compared to the packaged spears alone. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据