4.7 Article

In vitro antioxidant activities of three selected brown seaweeds of India

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 107, 期 2, 页码 707-713

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.08.081

关键词

seaweeds; antioxidant activity; phenols; DPPH; deoxyribose; reducing power

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vitro antioxidant activities of three selected Indian brown seaweeds - viz., Sargassum marginatum, Padina tetrastomatica and Turbinaria conoides - were investigated. Total phenolic content and reducing power of crude methanolic extract were also investigated. The activity of total methanolic extract and five different fractions (viz., petroleum ether (PE), ethyl acetate (EA), dichloromethane (DCM), butanol (BuOH) and aqueous) were studied using total antioxidant activity, DPPH radical scavenging and deoxyribose assays. EA fraction of S. marginatum exhibited higher total antioxidant activity of 39.62 mg ascorbic acid equivalent/g extract (or 0.31 mg ascorbic acid equivalent/g seaweed on dry weight basis) among the all the fractions. Among the fractions obtained from different seaweeds, EA fraction of S. marginatum showed higher DPPH scavenging activity of 23.16%; while PE fraction of T. conoides exhibited lower deoxyribose activity of 47.81%. Higher phenolic content (49.16 mg gallic acid equivalent/g extract or 0.86 mg GAE/g of seaweed on dry weight basis) was noticed in aqueous fraction of T. conoides. Reducing power of crude methanolic extract increased with increasing concentration. Reducing power of T. conoides and P. tetrastomatica were higher compared to standard antioxidant (alpha-tocopherol). Among the seaweeds, total methanolic extract of T. conoides had significantly higher phenol content (P < 0.05) compared to the other two species. In vitro antioxidant activity of methanolic extracts from all the three seaweeds showed an increase with increasing concentration indicating the dose dependency of these properties. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据